49 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Political revolutions occurred on almost every continent in 1989. Oppressive policies and practices gave way to even more democratic ways of managing governance and change. From the fall of the Berlin Wall, to Tiananmen Square, to the end of Apartheid, to democratic elections in Brazil and Chile, sociopolitical ideologies shifted from oligarchy and tyranny toward a broader awareness of human rights.
The work of American political activists followed similar patterns. McIntosh draws an analogy between sexism and racism, arguing that while male privilege is relatively well understood, white privilege remains unacknowledged even among feminists. Through this comparison, she sets out to bring two social movements back into association with each other because, she argues, antiracism and feminism in America began as two sides of the same democratic coin.
McIntosh argues that women’s suffrage in the United States grew out of the abolitionist movement. The debate over the 15th Amendment, granting suffrage to Black males, split the movement roughly along the lines of race and sex. Gradually, “feminism” came to focus on issues affecting only white, educated, upper-class women. This historical rift was never healed. McIntosh’s essay is a call for renewed unity.
McIntosh’s essay concludes with an acknowledgment of the many types of power imbalance. She says, “It is hard to disentangle aspects of unearned advantage which rest more on social class, economic class, race, religion, sex and ethnic identity than on other factors. Still, all of the oppressions are interlocking” (Paragraph 42). This awareness of the “interlocking” nature of power imbalances is often called “intersectionality.” McIntosh cites an earlier document, the Combahee River Collective Statement of 1977, as a clear expression of the principle of intersectionality. The Combahee River Collective was a short-lived but influential group of Black lesbians who felt that neither the civil rights movement nor the feminist movement adequately spoke for them. They argued that feminism was too white and civil rights activism too male, and neither movement understood the challenges of being queer in a heteronormative society. McIntosh argues that white privilege is interwoven with other types of power imbalance. Addressing racial privilege implies addressing class, sex, and other vectors of inequality.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: