52 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Jeri has spent 20 years consumed with her quarry, studying serial killers and sociopaths. She illustrates Frederick Nietzsche’s adage from Beyond Good and Evil in which he says, “Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”
In her quest for revenge and justice, Jeri has developed some of the characteristics that define Bannick as a sociopath. She is divorced from her husband and estranged from her brother. She feels very little remorse when she puts Lacy in danger by taunting the judge. She uses Lacy while at the same time manipulating her into feeling guilty for not being a better “friend.”
Popular fiction offers myriad examples of characters who draw on their personal demons to fight evil: These include the Dexter books and television series, the Lethal Weapon movies, and the John Wick films. The stories feature a damaged character with a severely out-of-balance life, but that imbalance gives them the ability to defeat an overwhelming antagonist.
Perhaps Jeri’s obsession is justified while she is patiently tracking the killer; maybe it is necessary to turn herself into a metaphorical monster to achieve that end. However, once she has turns that information over to the BJC and eventually the FBI, Jeri is unable to let go of the thing that consumed her life. She feels compelled to taunt the judge. Like him, loses self-control. Her inability to let go exposes her to the judge and puts her and Lacy in danger
The conclusion of the story implies that Jeri may be able to find balance again. Her daughter observes that Jeri is still young enough to create a satisfying personal life for herself. When everything is over, Jeri and Lacy hug and cry, indicating that Jeri has finally formed an emotional connection with someone. When she is no longer pursuing personal revenge, Jeri may be able to move forward while still honoring her 20 years of labor and dedication.
In his two books featuring Lacy, Grisham said that he is making an intentional effort to create a character through which he can discuss women’s attachments to other women and their\ relationship to the intersection of sex and power.
The author makes the point in reference to Lacy’s boss Cleo that most government hiring is done by men; men dominate the higher echelons of government agencies, especially law enforcement. Women, therefore, have reasons to think that being female might be a career disadvantage.
The author implies that qualities such as charm and sex appeal are effective tools for women. Both Jeri and Lacy observe that a short skirt and charming smile tend to make men more cooperative. Many women confess that they dress and wear their hair differently in order to be regarded positively by a male superior. They may claim to feel some guilt or shame about it, but some women feel they have no choice if they want to be successful.
There is debate concerning whether men are genuinely biased in their hiring of women. Men tend to strongly believe that they evaluate female job applicants fairly, whereas studies still indicate that when employers are presented with identical resumes, they are more likely to hire an applicant with a male-sounding name than one with a female-sounding name. When they do offer the job to a female applicant, they also tend to offer a salary in the lower range for the position. In the US, women earn only 83 percent for every dollar earned by a man, according to the US Census Bureau. (Shrider, Emily A. et al. “Income and Poverty in the United States: 2020.” U.S. Census Bureau. September 2021.)
Lacy and her boss Cleo illustrate different approaches that women might use to navigate the power disparity. Cleo achieves career advancement by trading on the illusion of youth and attractiveness—which is becoming less effective as she ages. She has reason to advance up the ladder as quickly as she can before she loses the capital on which she trades.
Lacy, on the other hand, has stayed in one place. The offer of the interim director’s position is probably overdue based on her competence and seniority. The question is whether she might have been offered the interim director’s position much sooner if she had been male. One might also ask whether a man might have been more aggressive about seeking advancement rather than waiting for an offer. All of Lacy’s (mostly male) colleagues have moved on to more prestigious and better paying jobs, and her brother Gunther certainly would not have hung around the same job for 12 years.
Lacy's story illustrates the intersection of sex and power. It is especially tricky for women to navigate patriarchal norms that often view them as less competent than men and sometimes reward sex appeal over competence.
Meanwhile, Lacy’s working relationship with Jeri resembles the character’s relationships with the women in the previous book, The Whistler. Lacy is motivated by a sense of concern and obligation toward other women that she does not express toward men. When Jeri calls Lacy on weekends and early in the mornings, Lacy firmly demands that Jeri respect her boundaries. Yet when Lacy hangs up the phone, she feels guilty for not being more caring toward a woman who she knows is hungry for contact. As Jeri says, “There’s no one else, Lacy. I need a friend. Please don’t abandon me.” (52)
Lacy and Jeri gradually work their way toward a healthier friendship, but first Jeri must get a sense of closure about the Bannick case.
The Bureau of Judicial Conduct exists to preserve the integrity of the judicial system. Grisham has serious concerns about the fairness and reliability of the justice system. He works for the Innocence Project which examines over two thousand false conviction claims each year, many of which are caused by judicial carelessness or incompetence.
A civil society depends on the rule of law to enable a large and diverse population to cooperate and resolve conflict. Since everyone is subject to the law, it is crucial that everyone be able to trust the system to protect them from both wrongdoers and false conviction. That trust depends on confidence in competent and impartial jurisprudence.
Some of the cases that Lacy handles in the course of her work involve allegations of drug or alcohol addiction, sexual improprieties, or financial irregularities. Other complaints include improper demeanor in the courtroom, or communicating with the defense or the prosecuting attorneys outside of court. In those cases, the BJC might issue a warning or sanction with heavier penalties to follow if the behavior continues.
Judges are also strongly encouraged to uphold standards of propriety outside the courtroom that are much more stringent than expectations for average people. A judge with questionable personal behavior in their private life may lose public trust. In those cases, the BJC might issue a warning and reprimand. One of the author’s concerns is that in such cases, there is no system in place to remove the offending judge from his or her position because, in most states, judges are elected by a public unaware of potential conflicts of interest. In those situations, the best politician wins the election, but a good politician does not necessarily make a good judge. The author never shows or addresses Bannick’s conduct in the courtroom, but given that his strongest motive is propping up his own ego, he is unlikely to be fair or dispassionate.
Because of the need for public trust in the judiciary, Lacy’s job is crucially important, yet her department’s budget is continually being cut. As a result, the department attracts a lower quality of staff members who view the position as either a dead end or a stepping-stone to more interesting jobs with better pay. Even Lacy is not deeply invested in her work. Removal of funding for the department is shortsighted. It saves money in the short-term but increases the likelihood of undermining public trust.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By John Grisham