logo

56 pages 1 hour read

The Deficit Myth: Modern Monetary Theory and the Birth of the People’s Economy

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2020

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 1-2Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 1 Summary: “Don’t Think of a Household”

Kelton challenges the common belief that federal government spending operates like household budgeting. She argues that this widespread misconception prevents effective economic policies and limits social progress.

In his 2010 State of the Union address, US President Obama compared federal budgeting to family belt-tightening. Kelton identifies this as “Myth #1”—the incorrect notion that the federal government should manage its budget like a household. This comparison, she explains, fundamentally misunderstands how government finance functions.

To illustrate the difference between government and household finance, Kelton introduces the concept of monetary sovereignty. The federal government, unlike households, states, or businesses, creates its own currency. Kelton distinguishes between currency issuers (governments with monetary sovereignty that create and control their money supply) and currency users (everyone else who must obtain the currency to participate in the economy). This power grants the government unique financial capabilities that other economic entities lack. She points to examples such as the US, Japan, the UK, and Canada as nations with monetary sovereignty, contrasting them with countries like Greece or Panama that lack this authority.

Kelton first encountered these ideas in 1997 through Warren Mosler’s book Soft Currency Economics. Initially skeptical, she conducted extensive research into government financial operations, leading her to accept Mosler’s perspective. To explain, Mosler told a story about motivating his children to do household chores. He created a system requiring them to earn his business cards to maintain their privileges, demonstrating how governments can create demand for their currency through tax obligations.

The author challenges UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s famous assertion that governments can only spend money collected from taxpayers. Instead, Kelton proposes that government spending actually precedes tax collection—a sequence she terms “S(TAB)” (Spending, then Taxing And Borrowing), rather than the conventional “(TAB)S” (Taxing And Borrowing, then Spending). She uses examples from the Federal Reserve’s operations and government payment systems to demonstrate this reverse order. She explains how the government makes payments through digital transactions, similar to how points are awarded in sports, rather than physically transferring currency.

Kelton identifies four primary purposes for taxation: creating demand for the currency, managing inflation, addressing income inequality, and influencing behavior through incentives and deterrents. She notes that while taxes serve these important functions, they do not fund federal spending in the way most people believe. Similarly, government borrowing serves to offer interest-bearing alternatives to regular dollars rather than to finance spending.

Despite the government’s ability to create currency, Kelton emphasizes that constraints still exist. She identifies inflation as a genuine concern and acknowledges that self-imposed congressional limitations, such as PAYGO (a House of Representatives rule that requires new spending to be offset by either spending cuts or tax increases) and debt ceiling restrictions, affect spending. However, she notes these political constraints differ from actual financial limitations: Congress has historically managed these self-imposed restrictions, often suspending them when deemed necessary.

Kelton addresses common concerns about unlimited spending, clarifying that MMT does not advocate unrestricted government expenditure. Rather, it suggests replacing budget-focused policies with approaches that prioritize human needs while respecting real resource constraints. She maintains that understanding these principles could help create economic policies that better serve society’s needs.

Chapter 2 Summary: “Think of Inflation”

Kelton challenges the common belief that government deficits indicate overspending, arguing instead that inflation serves as the true measure of excessive spending. She bases this argument on her experiences as Chief Economist for Senate Democrats in 2015, explaining how her time in Washington revealed widespread misunderstandings about federal budgets among lawmakers.

US Senator Mike Enzi approached federal budgets with the same mindset he had used as a small business owner and state legislator. According to Kelton, this perspective failed to account for crucial differences between currency users (like households and businesses) and currency issuers (like the federal government). She notes that both Republican and Democratic senators viewed deficits as problematic, differing only in whether they preferred spending cuts or revenue increases as solutions.

The author explains that the United States gained increased monetary sovereignty after President Nixon suspended dollar convertibility in 1971. Under the previous Bretton Woods system, federal spending required strict control to protect gold reserves. In contrast, today’s fiat currency system means the government cannot run out of money, though Kelton emphasizes this does not eliminate all constraints on spending.

The chapter examines various perspectives on inflation. The monetarist views associated with Milton Friedman hold that inflation results from excessive money supply and cannot be permanently traded for lower unemployment. Conversely, Keynesian economists believe central banks could use expanded money supply to reduce unemployment, accepting higher inflation as a reasonable trade-off. Kelton explains that the Federal Reserve attempts to manage inflation by adjusting interest rates, operating under a dual mandate from Congress to maintain price stability and maximum employment. The Federal Reserve chose a 2% inflation target and aims to control inflation by influencing borrowing costs, theoretically regulating how much money enters the economy through loans. Kelton critiques the Federal Reserve’s reliance on the concept of NAIRU (Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment), which assumes some baseline unemployment rate must exist to prevent inflation from accelerating. Kelton points to Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell’s 2019 acknowledgment that their estimates of sustainable unemployment rates had been consistently incorrect, as demonstrated when unemployment fell significantly below their projections without triggering inflation. She notes that former Fed governor Daniel Tarullo admitted the Federal Reserve lacks a reliable theory of inflation to guide its decisions.

Kelton introduces MMT alternative approach to managing inflation and employment, proposing solutions that move beyond the limitations of interest rate adjustments. Instead of using unemployment as a tool to control inflation, she advocates for a federal job guarantee program inspired by mid-20th century US President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s economic rights agenda and supported by civil rights leaders including Martin Luther King, Jr. This program would guarantee stability, providing employment opportunities during economic downturns while helping to maintain price constancy. The federal government would establish a base wage and benefit package, allowing the number of workers in the program to fluctuate with economic conditions. The program would focus on creating jobs in the care economy, supporting communities, people, and environmental needs. The author explains that such a program would need federal funding since state and local governments, as currency users rather than issuers, lack the financial capacity to guarantee employment. The job guarantee would help stabilize wages across the economy by effectively establishing a minimum wage and providing employers with an active pool of workers maintaining their skills, rather than long-term unemployed individuals whom businesses often hesitate to hire.

The chapter concludes by proposing reforms to federal budgeting processes. Rather than requiring new spending to be offset by new revenue (the PAYGO approach), Kelton suggests evaluating potential inflation risks before approving spending increases. She argues that Congress should determine how much spending needs to be offset to prevent inflation, rather than automatically assuming all new spending requires equivalent revenue increases. This approach would help prevent both unnecessary tax increases and undesired inflation while maximizing the government’s ability to serve public needs.

Kelton emphasizes that while the federal government faces no binding revenue constraint, it must exercise responsible fiscal management to prevent inflation. She compares this responsibility to Spider-Man’s motto that “With great power there must also come—great responsibility” (92), arguing that the power of federal spending should serve public interests while maintaining appropriate checks against excess.

Chapters 1-2 Analysis

In these chapters, Kelton’s argument centers on The Government’s Unique Power as a Currency Issuer. Kelton illustrates how the federal government, unlike households or businesses, creates and controls its own currency. The author explains that “the U.S. government is the sole manufacturer of dollars,” emphasizing that “both the U.S. Treasury and its fiscal agent, the Federal Reserve, have the authority to issue the U.S. dollar” (35). This fundamental distinction serves as the cornerstone for her subsequent arguments about federal spending and economic policy. Kelton reinforces this concept by describing how Warren Mosler demonstrated the principle to his children, showing that they only valued his business cards once he imposed a “tax” that could only be paid using those cards, thereby creating demand for what was previously considered worthless paper.

Challenging Conventional Wisdom that Deficits are Bad emerges as another central theme as Kelton systematically deconstructs popular misconceptions about federal spending. The author specifically targets Margaret Thatcher’s famous assertion that “the state has no source of money other than the money people earn themselves” (37), demonstrating how this perspective fundamentally miscasts the relationship between government spending and taxation. By introducing the concept of S(TAB) (Spending before Taxing And Borrowing), Kelton inverts the traditional (TAB)S (Taxing And Borrowing before Spending) model. She argues that “taxpayers weren’t funding the government; the government was funding the taxpayers” (45), a revolutionary perspective that challenges decades of conventional economic thinking about government finance.

In addressing Real Resource Constraints versus Financial Constraints, Kelton shifts the focus from arbitrary financial limitations to actual economic capacity. The author emphasizes that inflation, not the size of the deficit, serves as the true indicator of government overspending. She explains that when Congress authorized $716 billion in military spending, it “doesn’t need to ‘find the money’ to spend it. needs to find votes!” (48). This reframing represents a radical departure from conventional economic thinking, suggesting that policymakers should focus on real economic indicators rather than arbitrary fiscal targets. As Kelton notes, “MMT redefines what it means to use our real resources” (28) and argues that the true constraint on government spending is not financial but the availability of real resources in the economy.

The textual structure of these chapters demonstrates careful scaffolding of complex ideas, with Kelton using what she calls “Copernican moments” (50) to help readers understand how conventional wisdom about government finance gets everything backward. This comparison equates those who have not adopted MMT with those who refused to accept astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus’s heliocentric model of the solar system in the 1500s. Kelton systematically builds her case by first establishing the government’s unique role as currency issuer, then explaining how this fundamentally changes the relationship between government spending and taxation. This careful sequencing helps readers navigate what the Financial Times described as an “autostereogram” (50)—a perspective that, once seen, cannot be unseen.

Kelton grounds her arguments in historical context, particularly focusing on the US’s departure from the gold standard and the evolution of modern monetary systems: “August 15, 1971 marked a major turning point in monetary history” (63), as President Nixon’s decision to suspend dollar convertibility increased monetary sovereignty for the United States. This historical grounding helps convey how current economic thinking remains rooted in outdated models that no longer reflect monetary reality.

The analytical framework of modern monetary theory provides the theoretical foundation for Kelton’s arguments, with the author describing how MMT reveals that “in purely financial terms, our government can afford to purchase whatever is for sale in its own currency” (57). She builds this framework through careful explanation of operational realities, such as how the Federal Reserve actually creates money through keystrokes rather than physical printing. Kelton notes that “When the Wall Street banks needed trillions of dollars to survive the 2008 financial crisis, the Fed effortlessly conjured them into existence using nothing more than a keyboard at the New York Federal Reserve Bank” (47).

These opening chapters establish the foundational principles necessary for understanding Kelton’s broader argument about federal spending and economic policy. Through careful integration of theory, history, and accessible examples, she creates a case for reconsidering fundamental assumptions about government finance. If “With great power comes great responsibility” (96), then understanding the true nature of government finance is crucial for making better policy decisions that serve the public good.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 56 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools