logo

52 pages 1 hour read

The Book of Daniel

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1971

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Background

Historical Context: McCarthyism and the House Un-American Activities Committee

During the mid-20th century, the United States was gripped by a climate of intense fear and suspicion which became known as the Red Scare. This era was characterized by paranoia about Soviet influence in American society. The Red Scare manifested in two major waves: the first following World War I and the second, more infamous wave during the late 1940s through the 1950s. The latter phase, often referred to as McCarthyism, was named after Senator Joseph McCarthy, a Wisconsin Republican whose aggressive tactics fueled the paranoia. McCarthy capitalized on the prevailing anxiety by asserting that communists, painted as “un-American,” had infiltrated various sectors of American life, most notably government institutions. He claimed to possess a list of known communists within the government, though this list was never substantiated. McCarthy's allegations, while lacking substantial evidence, struck a chord with the public and ignited a nationwide witch hunt for suspected communists or sympathizers. This Red Scare disproportionately affected minorities, particularly LGBTQ+ people in professional positions. This ousting of LGBTQ+ people from public positions as suspected communist sympathizers is known as the Lavender Scare, an offshoot of McCarthy’s Red Scare.

McCarthy's rise to prominence came in 1950 when he delivered a speech in Wheeling, West Virginia, asserting that he had a list of 205 State Department employees who were members of the Communist Party. The number fluctuated in subsequent statements, but the impact was significant. His accusatory rhetoric and relentless pursuit of suspected communists led to a climate of fear and suspicion. This period witnessed the establishment of the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), which conducted highly publicized hearings aimed at identifying and rooting out communism in America. The fear of being branded a communist or a sympathizer led to a chilling effect on free speech and political expression. The HUAC hearings became infamous for their interrogations of government employees, members of the entertainment industry, academics, and even ordinary citizens who were suspected of having communist ties. The committee was often aggressive, creating an environment where refusal to cooperate or accusations of communist affiliation led to ruined careers and social ostracization. Loyalty oaths became commonplace, and anyone who expressed dissent or held views considered even remotely sympathetic to communism risked being labeled as disloyal.

While McCarthyism and the Red Scare instilled fear and damaged countless lives, their impact eventually waned. Several events contributed to McCarthy's downfall, including televised hearings in 1954 that exposed his aggressive tactics, leading to a decline in public support. Additionally, the Army-McCarthy hearings revealed his reckless behavior, contributing to his censure by the Senate in 1954. The Red Scare exposed the dangers of unchecked power and the manipulation of fear for political gain. The infringement on civil liberties and the damage done to individuals’ lives highlighted the importance of safeguarding democratic principles, including the right to free speech and the presumption of innocence. In The Book of Daniel, the characters wrestle with this social paranoia, as well as the tragedies caused by the obsession with communist infiltrators in the United States.

Historical Context: The Trial of the Rosenbergs

The Book of Daniel uses the trial of the Rosenbergs as a foundation for a fictional story. Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were a married couple at the center of one of the most controversial and highly publicized espionage cases in American history. Julius, an engineer, and his wife, Ethel, were accused of being key figures in a spy ring that allegedly transmitted atomic secrets to the Soviets. The accusations were based on the testimonies of Ethel's brother, David Greenglass, and other witnesses who implicated the Rosenbergs in passing classified information to the Soviet Union. The backdrop for the Rosenberg case was the growing tension between the United States and the Soviet Union, both vying for supremacy after World War II, as well as the paranoid atmosphere of McCarthyism in America.

The trial of the Rosenbergs took place in 1951 amid a fervent anti-communist atmosphere. The prosecution depicted them as traitors who endangered national security by providing crucial nuclear information to the United States’ Cold War adversary. The trial was highly controversial, marked by testimonies from witnesses, some of whom later recanted their statements, and circumstantial evidence linking the couple to espionage activities. The prosecution’s case heavily relied on the testimony of David Greenglass, who claimed that Julius had recruited him to pass atomic secrets to the Soviets and that Ethel had typed up notes for the spy ring. The evidence against Ethel was less concrete, and many argued that she was unfairly implicated due to her relationship with Julius. Despite maintaining their innocence throughout the trial, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were found guilty of espionage in 1951. They were sentenced to death, a decision that sparked widespread controversy and divided public opinion.

The case garnered international attention and sparked protests and appeals for clemency. Many believed that the evidence against the Rosenbergs was flimsy and insufficient to warrant the death penalty. Others, however, saw them as traitors who had jeopardized national security and deserved the harshest punishment. The campaign to spare the Rosenbergs’ lives gained momentum, with pleas for clemency directed at President Harry Truman and later President Dwight D. Eisenhower. Intellectuals, activists, and public figures, both in the United States and abroad, rallied in support of the Rosenbergs, arguing that their execution would be unjust and set a dangerous precedent.

Despite the public outcry and international appeals for clemency, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were executed by the electric chair on June 19, 1953, at Sing Sing Correctional Facility in New York. Their execution stirred further controversy, with many condemning the severity of the sentence and questioning the fairness of their trial. The execution of the Rosenbergs became a symbol of the fervor and fear surrounding the Red Scare and McCarthyism, highlighting the lengths to which the government and society were willing to go in the pursuit of suspected communist sympathizers, even in the face of public outcry and appeals for leniency. The Book of Daniel provides a fictional interpretation of how the public trial and execution of the Rosenbergs deeply affected American society.

Sociohistorical Context: The Yippies

The Book of Daniel is set in the 1960s in the United States. The protagonist, Daniel, examines the political legacy of the American Old Left movement, particularly in relation to the counterculture movement of the 1960s. The 1960s counterculture movement rejected traditional norms and values, advocated for civil rights, and protested the Vietnam War. At the heart of this movement were the Yippies, led by Abbie Hoffman, who inspired The Book of Daniel’s Artie Sternlicht.

Abbie Hoffman co-founded the Youth International Party with Jerry Rubin in the late 1960s. The Yippies’ approach to activism was characterized by a blend of street theater, political satire, and anti-authoritarianism. They embraced a lifestyle that celebrated free expression, communal living, and experimentation with drugs, all while advocating for social justice and challenging the government's policies, particularly regarding the Vietnam War. Hoffman and the Yippies were known for their “guerrilla theater” approach to activism, staging events like the levitation of the Pentagon in 1967, in which they attempted to use psychic energy to lift the building in an act of protest against the war. These stunts were meant to draw attention to serious issues while using absurdity to emphasize their points. However, their tactics also attracted criticism and controversy. Some viewed the Yippies’ methods as frivolous or ineffective, detracting from the seriousness of their causes. The media often portrayed them as a group of rebellious troublemakers rather than serious activists, which both enhanced their visibility and limited their credibility.

The counterculture movement, with the Yippies as a notable faction, left a lasting impact on American society. They contributed to a broader cultural shift, challenging traditional values, advocating for civil rights and equality, and inspiring a new generation of activists. While their methods were unconventional, the Yippies played a significant role in shaping the era’s dialogue around dissent, activism, and the pursuit of social change. As the 1960s came to a close, the counterculture movement gradually faded, but its legacy persisted.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 52 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools